[00:00:03]
[ Call to order: City Hall Council Chamber ]
30, WE'LL CALL THE MEETING TO ORDER RIGHT NOW.REVEREND NATE, SPRINKLE, ARE YOU HERE? WOULD YOU PLEASE SAY THE INVOCATION IN THE PLEDGE TO OUR FLAG? I'LL BE GLAD TO.
ALRIGHT, WOULD Y'ALL PRAY WITH ME THIS EVENING? HEAVENLY FATHER, WE COME TO YOU AND YOUR PRECIOUS SON'S NAME, THE LORD JESUS.
AND FATHER, WE JUST WANNA SAY THIS EVENING HOW GRATEFUL WE ARE TO YOU FOR ALL THE GRACE THAT YOU GIVE EACH ONE OF US, LORD, JUST FOR THE PRIVILEGE AND BLESSING OF OF LIFE AND THE BEAUTIFUL CREATION THAT WE LIVE IN.
AND FOR THE COOLER WEATHER THAT YOU'RE SENDING NOW.
WE JUST HAVE SO MUCH TO BE THANKFUL AND GRATEFUL FOR.
FATHER, WE'RE ALSO ASSURED BY YOUR WORD THAT WHATEVER WE ASK, ACCORDING TO YOUR YOUR WILL, YOU HEAR US AND YOU ANSWER FATHER.
SO WE BRING OUR PRAYER TO YOU THIS EVENING, JUST THANKING YOU FOR THESE THAT SERVE AS OUR CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS AND JUST PRAYING THAT YOU GIVE THEM WISDOM AND GUIDANCE AND DIRECTION FOR ANY MATTERS BEFORE THEM TONIGHT.
LORD, FOR ALL THOSE THAT SERVE US IN PUBLIC CAPACITY HERE IN THE CITY OF ROSENBERG, WE JUST GIVE YOU THANKS FOR EACH ONE OF THEM AND PRAY YOUR RICHEST BLESSINGS AND PROTECTION ON THEM, OUR POLICE, OUR FIREFIGHTERS, ALL THOSE WHO WILL BE RECOGNIZED FOR WONDERFUL SERVICE TODAY.
WE THANK YOU FOR THEM, FATHER, AS OUR CITY AND OUR COUNTY LOOKS FORWARD TO THE PARADE AND TO THE ACTIVITIES OF THE NEXT TWO WEEKS THROUGH THE FAIR.
WE JUST PRAY FOR PROTECTION AND SAFETY FOR ALL THOSE SERVING, FOR ALL THOSE ENJOYING THE FESTIVITIES AS WELL.
BUT AGAIN, FATHER, WE THANK YOU FOR THIS EVENING FOR THOSE SERVING AS OUR CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS AND OUR MAYOR.
GIVE THEM BLESSING TONIGHT AS THEY PROCEED THROUGH THIS MEETING.
WE PRAY THIS IN YOUR PRECIOUS NAME, LORD JESUS.
ALRIGHT, LET'S PLEDGE TO THE AMERICAN FLAG.
I PLEDGE ALLEGIANCE TO THE FLAG OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA AND TO THE REPUBLIC FOR WHICH IT STANDS, ONE NATION UNDER GOD, INDIVISIBLE, WITH LIBERTY AND JUSTICE FOR ALL.
THANK YOU, PASTOR SPRINKLE, PASTOR SPRINKLE OF THE CALVARY BAPTIST CHURCH LOCATED ON AIRPORT.
I'M NOT GONNA DO ANNOUNCEMENTS YET, BUT WHEN I DO, I I WANNA BE ABLE TO MENTION THE PARADE.
SO I'M GONNA WRITE MYSELF A NOTE ABOUT THAT.
OKAY, SO, SO TO OUR TWO GROUPS THAT WE'RE WAITING TO DO THE PROCLAMATION, WE'RE GONNA GET THROUGH ONE QUICK MEETING FIRST.
THIS'LL PROBABLY TAKE ABOUT 15 MINUTES.
YEAH, WE HAVE A NEW ATTORNEY HERE.
HOW ARE YOU DOING SIR? I DON'T KNOW IF WE'VE MET.
HAVE WE EVER HAVE WE, SCOTT, WE MET.
[ The City Council reserves the right to adjourn into Executive Session at any time during the course of this meeting to discuss any of the matters listed below, as authorized by Title 5, Chapter 551, of the Texas Government Code.]
[1. Consideration of and action on Resolution No. R-4096, a Resolution of the City Council of the City of Rosenberg, Texas, authorizing the City Manager to negotiate and execute, for and on behalf of the City, a Development Agreement, by and between the City and KB Home Lone Star, Inc. (Mohamed Bireima, Director of Planning) ]
CONSIDERATION OF AN ACTION ON RESOLUTION R DASH 4 0 9 6.A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF CITY OF ROSENBURG, TEXAS AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO NEGOTIATE AND EXECUTE FOR ON BEHALF OF THE CITY A DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT BY AND BETWEEN THE CITY AND KB HOME LOAN STAR, INC.
GOOD EVENING FOR CITY COUNCIL'S CONSIDERATION.
TONIGHT IS RESOLUTION NUMBER R 40 96 AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO NEGOTIATE AND EXECUTE A DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF ROSENBERG AND KB HOME LONE STAR INC.
THE AGREEMENT IS FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF APPROXIMATELY 219 ACRES OF LAND LOCATED WEST OF FM 29 77 MENNONITE ROAD, SOUTH OF BRYAN ROAD WITHIN THE CITY'S ETJ.
THE TRACK IS ALSO LOCATED WITHIN THE BOUNDARIES OF FORT BEND COUNTY MUNICIPAL UTILITY DISTRICT NUMBER 65.
THE FOLLOWING VICINITY MAP DEPICTS THE TRACK WITHIN MU NUMBER 65.
THE DEVELOPER HAS CONTRACT, HAS A CONTRACT TO PURCHASE THE TRACK AND DESIRES TO DEVELOP A RESIDENTIAL, UH, COMMUNITY, UH, SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL COMMUNITY FOR A MAXIMUM OF 670 SINGLE FAMILY LOTS FEATURING THREE LOT SIZES, UH, INCLUDING A MAXIMUM 30% OF 40 FEET WIDE.
LOTS, A MAXIMUM OF 40% OF 50 FEET WIDE, LOTS AND A MINIMUM OF 30% OF 60 FEET WIDE.
[00:05:01]
FENCES WILL CONSIST OF SIX FOOT HIGH MASONRY OR PRECAST CONCRETE FENCES ALONG COLLECTORS AND MAJOR THOROUGHFARES.RESIDENTIAL STREETS WILL BE 60 FEET WIDE, RIGHT OF WAY WITH 32 FEET OF PAVEMENT, A SINGLE FAMILY HOME.
ALSO, ALL SINGLE FAMILY HOMES WILL HAVE A HUNDRED PERCENT THREE-SIDED BRICK OR STONE FACADE ON THE FIRST FLOOR.
SO THOSE ARE THE HIGHLIGHTS OF DEVELOPMENT.
PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT WAS PRESENTED TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION AT THE REGULAR MEETING ON APRIL 15TH, 2026 IN THE CITY COUNCIL AT MAY 26TH, 2026.
CITY COUNCIL WORKSHOP STAFF RECOMMENDS APPROVAL OF RESOLUTION NUMBER R 40 96 AS PRESENTED.
THE FINAL AGREEMENT WILL BE ATTACHED TO RESOLUTION NUMBER R 40 96.
AND THAT'S CONCLUDE THE EXECUTIVE SUMMARY.
I'M GONNA GO THROUGH AND KIND OF, UH, REFRESH THAT THIS SITUATION, ESPECIALLY SINCE WE GOT MEMBERS OF THE PUBLIC HERE TOO, ORDINARILY, UM, WELL, SOMETHING LIKE THIS WOULDN'T, WOULD NOT MAKE IT THROUGH IF IT WERE IN THE CITY LIMIT, BUT THIS IS NOT IN THE CITY LIMIT.
WHY ARE WE DISCUSSING IT? BECAUSE THIS DEVELOPMENT PROBABLY COULD NOT HAPPEN.
IF, UH, IF, IF WE DIDN'T, WEREN'T ABLE TO PROVIDE THESE, THESE FOLKS ARE NEEDING WATER AND SEWER FROM THE CITY, WHICH MEANS THEY WOULD BE WATER AND SEWER CUSTOMERS AND THEY'RE GONNA PAY 150% OF WHAT WE PAY.
WE PAY WHATEVER OUR WATER BILL IS.
LET'S SAY YOUR WATER BILLS $70, THEIR WATER BILL WILL BE 70 PLUS HALF OF 70 $105 I GUESS.
UM, SO WE WOULD PICK UP WATER BILL CUSTOMERS, UH, TELL ME ABOUT THE FIRE SERVICE.
WE WOULD NOT, IT'S MY UNDERSTANDING THIS WOULD NOT INCLUDE FIRE SERVICES.
UH, WE HAVE A CONTRACT WITH ESG NUMBER SIX, UHHUH, AND THE CITY ACTUALLY DOES PROVIDE SERVICES TO THAT AREA BASED ON THE AGREEMENT THAT WE HAVE.
SO WE'LL PICK UP SOME MONEY FROM ESD SIX, WHICH IS THE FIRE DISTRICT THAT WILL PROVIDE SERVICES TO THIS AREA.
DO WE HAVE AN IDEA WHAT THE CITY WOULD PROCEEDS WHAT THAT WOULD BE? WE, WE HAVE AN AGREEMENT WITH THE ESD NUMBER SIX, UM, FOR 810,820,000.
UM, AND, AND THAT NUMBER DOESN'T CHANGE.
IT JUST SO HAPPENS THAT, THAT THIS, UM, DEVELOPMENT IS WITHIN ESD NUMBER SIX.
SO THE, THE DISTRICT PAYS US TO SERVE THE ENTIRE DISTRICT AND THIS IS A PORTION OF THAT DISTRICT.
BUT IT WOULDN'T GO DOWN IF WE NO SIR.
SO, UM, IF YOU'LL NOTICE THEY ARE, UH, THEY'RE NOT, I MEAN MY CONCERN WAS OF COURSE THE 40 FOOT LOTS.
GOING BACK, I WAS TOLD, AND THEY ARE HERE.
UH, IF THE COUNCIL HAS ANY QUESTIONS AND WE'LL GET TO THE COUNCIL.
SO IT'S MY UNDERSTANDING, WE HAD, WE'VE SEEN A PRESENTATION ON THIS AT A WORKSHOP BEFORE, UH, WAS IT BEFORE SCOTT AND AMANDA JOIN THE COUNCIL? I THINK IT WAS MAY 26TH WORKSHOP, CORRECT? MAY 26TH.
SO SCOTT WAS NOT SEATED, BUT AMANDA WAS.
THEY WANT 40, 50, AND 60 FOOT LOTS.
THE GOOD NEWS IS THEY'RE, THEY'RE NOT IN THE CITY LIMIT.
UH, THE GOOD NEWS IS WE WOULD, WE WOULD PICK UP SOME WATER CUSTOMERS.
THE BAD NEWS IS, IS IT WOULD, UH, HOW MANY HOUSES HERE? 600 SOMETHING HOUSES MAXIMUM SIX 70 COULD BE LESS THAN THAT.
SO IF YOU AVERAGE HOUSE, WHAT, THREE TO FOUR PEOPLE? UH, TWO TO THREE CARS, DEPENDING ON WHAT SIDE OF TOWN YOU LIVE ON.
TWO TO FOUR CARS I SHOULD SAY.
UM, THIS, THIS PROPERTY IS NOT IN THE CITY LIMIT, BUT IT IS RIGHT ON THE CITY LIMIT DIRECTLY ACROSS.
AND, UM, THEY WOULD ACCESS IT FROM BRIAN ROAD AND PROBABLY MENNONITE.
[00:10:01]
NOW, UH, TO MENNONITE ROAD, THAT'S THEIR MAIN OKAY.INTERESTS BOULEVARD ENTRANCE WITH POTENTIALLY, UH, UH, A TRAFFIC LIGHT AT SOME POINT.
AND LET ME JUST REMIND THE COUNCIL, IF ANYBODY'S BEEN TO MENNONITE IN REDDING ROAD ABOUT SEVEN 30 IN THE MORNING, IT'LL TAKE YOU A WHILE TO GET THROUGH.
NOW IT'S NOT THESE FOLKS' FAULT, THAT'S A, THAT'S A TEXT DOT ISSUE.
BUT WE GET COMMENTARY FROM THE PUBLIC ABOUT, UM, ABOUT HIGH DENSITY HOUSING AND HOW THEY DON'T REALLY WANT US TO, UH, YOU KNOW, TRY TO ACCOMMODATE THAT.
I GUESS OUR ARGUMENT HERE WOULD BE, WELL, THIS IS NOT, IT'S NOT IN, IT'S NOT IN THE CITY.
AND THEY COULD COME BACK AND SAY, WELL, YOU DIDN'T HAVE TO MAKE THAT WATER AND SEWER AGREEMENT WITH THEM.
UM, IF, IF THEY'VE BEEN WORKING ON THIS AND THEY'VE BEEN WORKING WITH THE CITY FOR SEVEN MONTHS.
SO I FEEL BAD AND I FEEL A LITTLE GUILTY THAT, UM, THAT THEY'VE PUT IN A LOT OF WORK AND A LOT OF MONEY.
SO NOW IT'S TIME FOR THE DE UH, COUNCIL TO DECIDE IF WE WANT TO, AS A GROUP, ALLOW THEM TO GET WATER AND SEWER, WHICH WILL MAKE THEIR DEVELOPMENT, UH, WHICH WILL ALLOW THEM TO MAKE THEIR DEVELOPMENT, UH, TO TAKE PLACE.
MY GUESS IS IF IF WE VOTE NO, IT'S GONNA KILL THEIR DEAL.
AMANDA, WHY DON'T WE BEGIN WITH YOU? WHAT DO YOU THINK? I, WELL IT IS IN THE ETJ.
IT IS RIGHT ACROSS THE STREET FROM OUR CITY LIMIT LINE ACROSS FROM MENNONITE.
AND THEY WOULD, THEY'RE ASKING FOR THE WATER SERVICES FROM THE CITY, CORRECT? FOR THIS ONE? CORRECT.
OUR, YOU KNOW, OUR MINIMUM LOTS.
I KNOW THEY DON'T HAVE TO GO BY THAT 'CAUSE THEY'RE NOT IN THE CITY, BUT 40 FOOT IS JUST SO SMALL.
AND I LOOK AT THAT AREA ABOUT ALL THE CONGESTION MORE THAT THAT WILL BRING.
AND THAT'S REALLY NOT TECH STOCK'S FAULT, IT'S THE COUNCILS AND COMMISSIONERS FOR LETTING ALL THESE NEIGHBORHOODS BE BUILT BEFORE STREETS ARE READY FOR THEM.
I HEAR THE CITIZENS, THEY DON'T WANT ANY MORE NEIGHBORHOODS.
THEY'RE TIRED OF ALL THE SMALL HOMES AND NOT SAY THE SIZE OF THE HOME, BUT JUST HOW CLOSE ALL THESE NEIGHBORHOODS ARE BECOMING COMING TOGETHER.
CITIZENS DON'T WANT THAT THAT LIVE HERE.
I HEAR COMPLAINTS ALL THE TIME.
WHY DID Y'ALL ALLOW THAT TO BE BUILT? WELL, IT'S NOT THE CITY LIMITS.
WE CAN'T TELL PEOPLE WHAT TO DO WITH THEIR PROPERTY, BUT IF WE HAVE ANY SAY SO, I JUST CAN'T IN GOOD CONSCIENCE AGREE WITH THIS JUST BECAUSE OF WHAT I HEAR FROM CITIZENS WITH ALL THE CONGESTION, ANOTHER 600 AND SOMETHING HOMES, 1200 MINIMUM CARS IS GONNA COST AND CAUSE IN THAT AREA, AND I, AND I'M SORRY FOR THAT, BUT 40 FOOT HOMES, THAT'S JUST TOO SMALL.
AND I KNOW WITH COST THE DEALER, YOU KNOW, THE DEVELOPERS NEED TO MAKE MONEY AND ALL THAT SORT OF BUSINESS.
I UNDERSTAND ALL THE BUSINESS END OF IT, BUT WE'RE JUST GETTING TOO MANY OF THEM.
WE'RE GETTING TOO MANY AND BEING RIGHT ACROSS THE STREET IN THE CITY, IT'S GONNA BECOME THE CITY PROBLEM EVENTUALLY.
SO I JUST, I I'M SORRY, I JUST CAN'T GO FOR IT.
THEY HAVE THE RIGHT TO BUILD THEIR, THEIR DEVELOPMENT.
UH, UH AND WE HAVE THE RIGHT NOT TO PROVIDE THEM WATER AND SEWER.
WELL THAT'S WHAT I'M SAYING IS WHY I WOULD NOT AGREE TO IT.
SO, SO IF THEY CAN DO FOR THAT PURPOSE, IF THEY CAN DO IT WITHOUT US, MORE POWER TO 'EM.
SO WE SHOULDN'T FEEL NECESSARILY SO BAD IF, IF THE COUNCIL SO CHOOSES TO NOT SELL 'EM WATER AND SEWER.
BUT I THINK THEIR POINT OF IT IS, UH, IT DOESN'T MAKE ECONOMIC SENSE FOR THEM TO, UM, UH, THEY'D HAVE TO PUT IN THEIR OWN WATER AND SEWER SYSTEM AND I'M NOT SURE WHAT THAT IS FOR SOMETHING LIKE THAT.
WELL, AND THAT'S SOMETHING THEY HAVE TO DISCUSS AFTER ALL THE ACCOUNT DECIDE WHAT WE'RE GONNA DO, BUT SURE.
THAT WOULD BE MY, MY THOUGHTS AND MY RECOMMENDATION.
RICHARD, DO YOU HAVE A AN OPINION ON IT? I SURE HOPE SO.
IS IT ON? UH, UH, I, I FEEL THE SAME WAY.
I CAN'T STAND THESE LITTLE 40 FOOT LOTS.
I WISH THERE WAS SOMETHING WE COULD DO ABOUT IT, BUT IT'S IN THE ETJ.
SO WE'VE LET OTHER DEVELOPERS DO WHAT THEY WANT IN THE ETJ BEFORE,
[00:15:01]
BECAUSE WE REALLY HAVE NOTHING TO SAY ABOUT IT.BUT THIS ONE JUST HAPPENS TO BE RIGHT ON OUR DOORSTEP.
AND THIS ONE, THE OTHER ONES THAT YOU'RE REFERRING TO, WE DIDN'T PROVIDE.
YEAH, WE DIDN'T PROVIDE ANYTHING.
WE DID NOT PROVIDE THE, WE COULDN'T STOP 'EM.
UM, WE ARE STILL LOOKING AT WATER SALES.
IF THEY COME, WE'RE STILL LOOKING AT SALES TAX REVENUE.
UM, I, I, I SAY I'LL BE IN FAVOR OF IT.
UM, SCOTT, UH, I'M LEANING TO APPROVING THIS.
UM, IT'S ONLY ABOUT A THIRD OF THE HOUSES ARE 40 FOOT LOTS.
THE OTHER LOTS ARE 50 AND 60 FEET.
PLEASE KEEP IN MIND OUR CURRENT STANDARD IS 70 FEET.
SO THIS IS EXTREMELY, IF THIS WERE IN THE CITY, IT WOULD BE EXTREMELY OUT OF COMPLIANCE, BUT IT'S NOT IN THE CITY, BUT IT'S RIGHT ON THE LINE, BUT IT AIN'T OVER THE LINE.
STEVE, WHAT DO YOU THINK? GUYS LET YOU FINISH.
UH, ARE YOU, ARE YOU FINISHED, SCOTT? ALRIGHT.
A FEW WORDS SEEMS LIKE THEY BUILD IN ETJ JUST TO GET OUT FROM OUR VARIANCE.
AND, AND, AND THAT'S MOST LIKELY AND EVENTUALLY IT'S GONNA GET ANNEXED BECAUSE EVERYTHING'S GROWING.
UM, IF WE WAS TO, UH, GO AHEAD AND IMPROVE IT, HOW, HOW CAN WE DO ON THE, THE WASTEWATER AND WATER IMPACT FEES? CAN WE MAKE UP FOR THE, THE, UM, PROPERTY TAX LOSS THROUGH THAT? WELL, THERE'S NO PROPERTY TAX LOSS.
WELL, THERE'S, THEY'RE NOT PAYING PROPERTY TAXES.
THEY'RE, THEY'RE NOT PAYING TO US.
BUT THEY'RE PAYING TO, THEY'RE PAYING TO THE COUNTY.
THEY'RE PAYING THE SCHOOL DISTRICT.
I ASSUME THEY'LL BE IN A MUD, RIGHT? THEY'LL BE IN A MUD, YES.
BUT THEY'LL, THERE'LL BE IMPACT FEES.
IT'S GONNA BRING, WELL IF WE, IF WE KEEP, YOU KNOW, THE CONSUMER HAS NO IDEA.
YEAH, WELL IF WE KEEP APPROVING THESE ARE JUST GONNA KEEP BUILDING ALL ALONG OUR ETJ AND I'M NOT GONNA PROVE IT.
ALRIGHT, FELIX, WHAT'S SAY YOU? UM, I SAY WE, WE JUST GIVE THEM THE WATER.
I MEAN, WE CAN PROFIT FINANCIALLY FROM, YOU KNOW, GIVING THEM WATER.
UM, GRANTED, I KNOW IT'S GONNA BE A LOT OF CONGESTION, BUT WE WOULD BE SELLING THEM THE WATER.
SO, SO YOU'RE OKAY WITH THAT? ONE THING I HAD AN ISSUE WAS WITH, UH, WITH CONGESTION AND TRAFFIC.
I, I DON'T, I DON'T KNOW IF IT'S ALREADY FULLY FINISHED THERE, BUT I ONLY SEE ONE ENTRANCE.
IS THERE GONNA BE ANOTHER EXIT SOMEWHERE ELSE? CORRECT.
UH, THE DEVELOPMENT JUST TO THE NORTH OF THIS COURT, ROSE RANCH, WHICH AN AGREEMENT THAT CITY COUNCIL HAS APPROVED, WE WILL CONTINUE TO, TO, TO EXTEND ROSE RANCH BOULEVARD SOUTH TO THE DOORSTEP OF THIS DEVELOPMENT.
AND THIS WILL ALSO CONNECT TO THE ROSE RANCH DEVELOPMENT.
SO THEY'LL HAVE ACCESS TO BRYAN ROAD.
AND THE CITY IS LOOKING TO ALSO IN THE FUTURE, EXTEND SP ROAD, WHICH WILL COME THROUGH THE PROPERTY TO THE WEST.
I MEAN, LIKE YOU SAID, MAYOR, THERE ARE IN THE ETJ, UM, I DON'T THINK WE REALLY HAVE MUCH SAY TO SEE WHAT THEY CAN BUILD ON THERE, BUT IF WE CAN PROFIT ON SOMETHING, MAYBE WE CAN SELL 'EM THE WATER AND STILL BE FINANCIALLY PROFITABLE ON THAT.
UM, AND I WANT TO BE, AND I WANNA BE FAIR TO THESE FOLKS, THERE WAS SOME OTHER CONCESSIONS I THOUGHT RIGO, THAT THESE FOLKS, UH, AND HAMMOND, YOU CAN TELL US THAT THESE FOLKS, UH, GAVE INTO THIS PACKAGE.
CAN YOU REFRESH US FOR THAT ON THAT? UH, SO THEY WILL BE, UH, EXTENDING, UM, CITY WATER LINES AND THESE LINES WILL BE DEDICATED TO THE CITY.
SO THEY'LL CREATE A, ULTIMATELY THERE'LL BE A LOOP.
THEY'RE ALSO GONNA BE BUILDING A LIFT STATION.
THAT WILL BE THEIR LIFT STATION.
BUT, UH, IT WILL BE SERVING THESE THREE DEVELOPMENT.
UH, THEY'RE ALSO GONNA HELP US WITH, UH, FUTURE ROADS.
WHERE ARE THE NEW WATER LINES GOING? I'M SORRY? WHERE ARE THE NEW WATER LINES? SO RIGHT NOW WE HAVE A WATER LINE THAT, UH, AT KIRBY, UH,
SO IF YOU LOOK AT THAT, THEY'RE EXTEND THOSE BLUE LINES, UH, THE ONE THAT COMES FROM HERBI COP DOWN ON 29 77 ALL THE WAY TO THEIR ENTRANCE, THAT BOULEVARD ENTRANCE.
AND THEN IT WILL GO TO THE WEST, TO THE FUTURE ROSE RANCH BOULEVARD.
AND, UH, THEY'RE ALSO GONNA BE EXTENDING, UH, BUILDING A LIFT STATION AND CONNECTING THAT TO THE CITY WESTWATER SYSTEM.
WILL WE HAVE ACCESS FOR FOLKS IN THE CITY LIMIT TO BENEFIT FROM THE LIFT STATION IN THE FUTURE? I DON'T, I DON'T BELIEVE SO.
[00:20:02]
SO THE LIFT STATION, WELL, THE LIFT STATION WILL, THE LIFT STATION WILL END UP SERVING THE, THE, THE DIFFERENT DEVELOPMENTS ON THAT WHERE MUD 65 AND MUD 66 ARE, IT'LL END UP SERVING THEM.THE OTHER BENEFIT IS JUST THE DETENTION THAT, THAT, UH, THEY'RE LOOKING AT, UH, THE DETENTION POND.
THEY'RE GONNA HAVE, THEY'RE GONNA TRY TO SEE IF THEY CAN FIND SOME, UH, CAPACITY SO THAT WE CAN ACTUALLY USE, UH, HERE IN THE CITY TO BENEFIT THE RESIDENTS HERE IN THE CITY WHO'S GONNA BE RESPONSIBLE.
THAT'S FOR MAINTAINING THOSE LIFT STATION.
THEY ARE THE, THE OPERATOR THERE.
SO WE'RE ALL WE'RE GONNA DO IS, UH, BE SUPPLYING THEM WATER AND THEN THEY'RE GONNA GET THE SEWAGE TO US AND THEN WE'LL TREAT IT AT OUR SEWER PLANT TO GET THE WATER TO AND CORRECT.
AND RICO, WHAT ELSE WAS THERE? UH, I BELIEVE THEY WERE SUPPOSED TO HAVE OF A, UH, UH, FENCING THAT WAS SUPPOSED TO BE, UH, UH, ALONG THE MAJOR, UH, THROW DOORS.
YES, THEY'RE, YES, THEY'RE PUTTING WALLS ALONG THE MAJOR ROADWAYS ALONG 29 77 AND ALONG THEIR EAST WEST ROADWAY.
UH, AND UH, THEY ALSO HAVE SOME, UH, PARKS, INTERNAL PARKS, RECREATION AREA SO THAT, THAT WILL BENEFIT THE DEVELOPMENT AND THEY'LL END UP PAYING INTO THE PARKLAND DEDICATION.
DID YOU HAVE SOME OF TO SAY MS. JOYCE? UM, WELL I WAS JUST GONNA SAY THE LIFT STATION IS ALSO GONNA BENEFIT THE OTHER, UM, THE OTHER DEVELOPMENT THAT Y'ALL APPROVED EARLIER THIS MONTH.
SO THOSE TWO DEVELOPERS ARE KIND OF WORKING HAND IN HAND ON, UM, USING LIFT STATION TOGETHER AND DOING THINGS LIKE THAT.
SO, UM, WE DID APPROVE THE OTHER ONE AT THE BEGINNING OF THE MONTH.
UM, AND THEY HAVE BEEN WORKING TOGETHER TO UTILIZE SOME OF THE SAME INFRASTRUCTURE.
YOU MENTIONED THE PARK DEDICATION FUND.
WHAT'S YOUR ESTIMATE THAT WE WOULD BE IN RECEIPT OF OVER 670 HOMES? IT WOULD DEPENDS.
UM, DO WE KNOW HOW MUCH PARK, I MEAN, IT DEPENDS ON HOW MUCH PARKLAND THEY'RE PUTTING IN.
AND THEY HAVE TO PAY FOR THE DIFFERENCE.
ANY, ANY RANGE OR GUESSTIMATE.
SO THE MINIMUM THAT THEY'LL PAY $200 PER PER LOT, THAT WOULD BE THE MINIMUM.
BUT IT COULD BE IF, IF THEY DON'T, IF THEY DON'T PROVIDE ANY, IT COULD BE GO UP TO $2,000 PER LOT, 680 LOTS TIMES $200 AND, AND THEN EACH, EACH LOT WILL END UP PAYING THE IMPACT FEES, WHICH IS ABOUT, YOU KNOW, $4,800 PER PER HOUSE.
SO WE MAKE $4,800 FOR EACH IMPACT FEE.
DO WE COLLECT THE IMPACT FEES OR DOES THE MUD WE COLLECT? WE DO.
AND EVEN THOUGH IT'S NOT THE CITY, THE CITY COMES AND RECEIPTS AND RECEDED AT $4,800.
AS FAR AS THE TRAFFIC CONGESTION GOES, UM, HOW DO YOU SEE ANY TIME SOON WHERE THAT'LL BE ALLEVIATED? I WANNA SAY TEXDOT DISTILLS PUSHING THAT, THAT ROADWAY PROJECT FOR, FOR MENNONITE ANOTHER 10 YEARS BEFORE THEY ACTUALLY START CONSTRUCTION OUT THERE.
IT'LL END UP BEING A, IT'LL END UP BEING A LITTLE BIT, UM, AGAIN, THERE'S GONNA BE, UH, SEVERAL ROADWAYS THAT ARE GONNA END UP GOING, GOING BACK TO BRYAN.
EVENTUALLY THERE'LL BE A, A CONNECTION GOING, UH, ALONG SPOT CHECK AND, AND GOING BACK TO COPELAND, UM, RICE FUEL ROADS EVENTUALLY CONNECT INTO THE DEVELOPMENT ALSO TO THE NORTH.
YOU COULD PRETTY MUCH CONSIDER THIS THE SAME AS 36.
THOSE PEOPLE LIVE SOUTH ON 36.
THE CONGESTION THAT HAPPENS DURING AND AND THERE IS THERE, THERE THERE'S DEFINITELY GONNA BE, WELL YOU GO OUT THERE RIGHT NOW, THERE'S, THERE'S, THERE'S CONGESTION RIGHT NOW.
UM, BUT THERE'S GONNA BE MORE, MORE DEVELOPMENT.
THAT'S, THAT'S GONNA GO, YOU'RE GONNA GO HERE, IT'S GONNA GO RIGHT DOWN THE ROAD.
THE ROADS HADN'T KEPT UP WITH THE BUILDINGS.
GEORGE, DO YOU HAVE AN OPINION ON THIS? UH, THESE FOLKS AREN'T, THESE FOLKS AREN'T IN THE CITY, BUT THEY WANT, THEY CAN'T MAKE THIS DEVELOPMENT HAPPEN THE WAY IT'S LAID OUT NOW WITHOUT OUR HELP.
BUT THEY'RE BUILDING NOT WITHIN THE STANDARDS THAT WE WANT IN THE CITY.
UH, THERE'S SOME BENEFITS THEY'VE GIVEN THE CITY AND WE WILL HAVE SOME FINANCIAL BENEFITS.
UM, BUT IT'S A, IT IS A GROUP DECISION.
DO YOU HAVE AN OPINION OR DO YOU JUST WANT TO I THINK YOU NEED TO TAKE IN CONSIDERATION THE PEOPLE THAT ARE ALREADY THERE ESTABLISHED ALREADY.
ACROSS THE STREET OR, YEAH, HE'S SAYING ALONG THE ROAD.
IS THAT WHAT YOU MEAN? MM-HMM
WHAT ARE THE WISHES OF THE COUNCIL? WE NEED A MOTION ONE WAY OR THE OTHER.
I MAKE A MOTION TO REJECT RESOLUTION R 4 0 9 6.
AMANDA MADE A MOTION OR REJECT IT.
STEVE, YOU YOU'RE OPPOSED TO IT.
DO YOU WANT TO, YOU WANT TO SECOND HER A MOTION? UH, NO.
ANYBODY ELSE WANNA SECOND AMANDA'S MOTION.
ALRIGHT, WE HAVE A SECOND BY GEORGE.
ALL THOSE IN FAVOR OF REJECTING
[00:25:03]
OF REJECTING IT INDICATE BY PUSHING GREEN.SO IT DOESN'T SAY HOW FOLKS ARE VOTING.
SO WE, I'M STILL WAITING FOR SOME VOTE.
EVERYBODY VOTES, BUT IT'S A MOTION TO REJECT MOTION.
SO I'M GONNA REJECT IT BY, I'M GONNA REJECT THE, THE MOTION.
YOU WANNA REPEAT YOURS? HE MESSED UP ON HIS.
GEORGE, YOU GONNA VOTE? OH, GEORGE, I HAVE TO CANCEL IF YOU WANT TO.
YOU GONNA VOTE? YOU GOTTA VOTE GEORGE.
SEE IF YOU WANT TO VOTE WITH YOUR SECOND STILL THAT'S NOT, IF YOU WANT VOTE, YOU NEED CLEAR TO START OVER WHAT AMANDA SAYS.
DO WE NEED A CLEAR TO START OVER SINCE YOU'RE SECOND? YEAH, I THINK SO.
I DON'T LIKE THE MACHINE TO BEGIN.
STEVE, ARE YOU, ARE YOU A NO OR YES.
YOU WANT TO APPROVE IT? YEAH, HE WANTS TO APPROVE IT.
THAT, OKAY THEN YOU, THEN YOU VOTED CORRECTLY.
NO, HE WANT, YOU WANT REJECT IT, CORRECT? YEAH.
SO YOU WOULD VOTE, VOTED RIGHT THEN YOU VOTED CORRECTLY.
SO THE VOTE STANDS, VOTE WAS CORRECT.
JUST SO EVERYONE KNOWS, UH, A FAILING TO PASS THE MOTION TO REJECT IT DOES NOT AUTOMATICALLY, UH, ACCEPT WE WOULD HAVE TO GO TO ANOTHER VOTE IN ORDER TO ACTUALLY, UH, ACCEPT THE, THE RESOLUTION.
OKAY, WELL WE JUST HAD A VOTE AND STEVE STANDS BY HIS VOTE AND EVERYBODY ELSE IS STANDING BY THEIR VOTE.
SO, SO FAR IT'S BEEN, IT'S BEEN REJECTED.
DO WE NEED ANOTHER MOTION? SO WHAT, WHAT DO Y'ALL WANT TO DO NOW? WHAT'S THE ACTION COUNT? UH, ATTORNEY.
IF IT WAS, LET'S DO ANOTHER VOTE BECAUSE SHE JUST CANCELED IT.
OH WELL NO HAS TO BE, OH, SHE, OKAY.
PUT YOUR ANSWER BACK IN MOTION.
IF YOU WANT TO REJECT IT, YOU VOTE YES.
IF YOU DON'T AGREE WITH, WITH REJECTING IT, YOU VOTE NO.
SO RICHARD AND GEORGE AND THAT'S ALRIGHT.
SO FOUR WISH TO REJECT AND THREE OPPOSED TO REJECT.
ALRIGHT, SO, UH, MR. ATTORNEY, WHAT, UH, WHAT DO YOU, WHAT DO YOU WANT US TO DO NOW? UH, WELL THERE WILL BE, IT'S UH, IF IT'S BEEN REJECTED THEN YOU CAN MOVE ON TO A NEW TOPIC.
UNLESS SOMEBODY HAS ANOTHER, UH, WE REJECTED WE'RE, WE'RE GONNA GO ON TO ANOTHER TOPIC.
RESOLUTION, RIGHT? WE WEREN'T GIVEN ANYTHING.
WHAT WAS DISCUSSED WAS, YOU KNOW, TO, TO SELL.
ALRIGHT, WHAT'S THE NEXT ITEM?
[2. Consideration of and action on Resolution No. R-4097, a Resolution of the City Council of the City of Rosenberg, Texas, authorizing the City Manager to negotiate and execute, for and on behalf of the City, a Water Supply and Wastewater Services Agreement, by and between the City and KB Home Lone Star, Inc. (Mohamed Bireima, Director of Planning) ]
TO GIVE THEM WATER.DO WE, DO WE NEED TO TAKE ACTION ON THIS? WE THERE? NO.
IT WAS REJECTED SO WE CAN MOVE ON.
IT WOULD BE SIMPLER SINCE THE ACTION IS CONSIDERATION OF IT'S TYPICALLY A LITTLE SIMPLER.
DO WE HAVE TO TAKE ACTION NOW? ON ITEM NUMBER TWO, DO WE HAVE TO TAKE ACTION ON, ON THE SERVICE AGREEMENT? HE'S ASKING ABOUT THE SERVICE AGREEMENT.
THERE IS ANOTHER, IF SOMEBODY WANTS TO MAKE A MOTION TO UH, ACCEPT THE RESOLUTION, THEY CAN TRY THAT.
WE'RE ON ITEM TWO NOW, WHICH, WHICH IS THE SAME PROJECT EXCEPT FOR THE WATER.
UM, NO, YOU DO NOT NEED TO TAKE.
[3. Consideration of and action on Ordinance No. 2026-53, an Ordinance of the City Council of the City of Rosenberg, Texas, amending the Fiscal Year 2025-2026 Budget by authorizing the City Manager to execute Budget Amendment 26-04, appropriating funding for the replacement of the Fire Station No. 3 roof, in the amount of $42,000.00. (Luis Garza, Executive Director of Administrative Services) ]
NUMBER THREE.CONSIDERATION OF AN ACTION ON AN ACTION ON AN ORDINANCE OF CITY COUNCIL.
CITY OF ROSENBURG, TEXAS AMENDING THE FISCAL YEAR 2025 DASH 2026 BUDGET BY AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE BUDGET AMENDMENT 26 DASH ZERO FOUR.
APPROPRIATING FUNDING FOR THE REPLACEMENT OF FIRE STATION NUMBER THREE.
ROOF IN THE AMOUNT OF $42,000.
GOOD EVENING MAYOR MEMBERS COUNSEL, THIS AGENDA ITEM IS BEING PRESENTED TO CITY COUNCIL TO REQUEST APPROVAL OF BUDGET AMENDMENT 26 DASH FOUR, WHICH ALLOCATES 42,000 FROM THE FIRE STATION.
NUMBER THREE FUND BALANCE TO REPLACE THE ROOF AT FIRE STATION NUMBER THREE AND COMPLETE THE ASSOCIATED REPAIRS.
[00:30:01]
STATION NUMBER THREE WAS COMPLETED IN JULY 20TH, 2014.SINCE THEN, THE STATION WHICH IS SITUATED IN AN OPEN AREA EXPOSED TO HIGH WINDS, HAS EXPERIENCED RECURRING ROOF LEAKS.
SIGNIFICANT WEATHER EVENTS INCLUDING HURRICANE HARVEY IN 2017 AND HURRICANE BARREL IN 2024 CONTRIBUTED TO ONGOING ROOF ISSUES.
DESPITE MULTIPLE REPAIR EFFORTS OVER THE YEARS.
LEAKS CONTINUED TO APPEAR IN VARIOUS LOCATIONS IN 2026.
ADDITIONAL ROOF LEAKS WERE REPORTED.
CONTRACTORS INVESTIGATED AND FOUND DAMAGED ROOFING MATERIALS.
REPAIRS WERE PERFORMED INCLUDING THE REPLACEMENT OF UNDERLAYMENT, LAMENT FLASHING AND SHINGLES.
MULTIPLE ROOFING CONTRACTORS, INCLUDING THE ORIGINAL REPAIR CONTRACTOR, HAVE INSPECTED THE ROOF AND HAVE NOT BEEN ABLE TO IDENTIFY ANY ADDITIONAL VISIBLE DAMAGE.
ALTHOUGH LEAKS CONTINUE, BOTH THE BUILDING MAINTENANCE DEPARTMENT AND THE CONTRACTORS NOW RECOMMEND A COMPLETE, UH, ROOF REPLACEMENT TO RESOLVE THE PERSISTENT WATER INTRUSION STAFF RECOMMENDS APPROVAL OF ORDINANCE NUMBER, ORDINANCE NUMBER 2026 DASH 53 AS PRESENTED.
MY ONLY COMMENT WITH IS IT'S ONLY A 12 YEAR, UH, A 12-YEAR-OLD ROOF.
UM, I HOPE THAT EVERY BUILDING THE CITY MAY BUILDS ANY NEW BUILDING.
UM, THEY DON'T HAVE TO REPLACE ROOFS EVERY 12 YEARS AROUND HERE, BUT, YOU KNOW, JUST, JUST KEEP IN MIND WHERE THAT FIRE STATION'S AT AND AFTER THE, THOSE TWO HURRICANES, WE HAD MULTIPLE BUILDINGS IN THAT AREA THAT EXPERIENCED ROOFING DAMAGE OUT THERE.
IF YOU REMEMBER THAT AREA GOT GOT HIT PRETTY GOOD.
WELL, IT'S KIND OF SELF-EXPLANATORY, BUT WE'LL, WE'LL, WE'LL GIVE THE COUNCIL AN OPPORTUNITY TO, TO COMMENT.
FELIX, WHAT DO YOU THINK? 42,000.
I MEAN, IF IT'S NEEDED, IF IT'S A NECESSITY.
UM, GOOD WAY TO LET A BUILDING RUIN IS TO LET IT HAVE A LEAKY ROOF.
RICHARD? OH YEAH, THEY'RE, THEY'RE HERE LOOKING AT US, SO I GUESS WE HAVE TO
I WAS GONNA SAY, BUT THEY DON'T LIVE AT THE FIRE STATION, BUT REALLY THEY DO.
THEY DO LIVE A LOT AT THE FIRE STATION.
UH, GEORGE WHAT DO YOU THINK? GET 'EM A NEW ROOF.
THEY NOBODY WANTS TO SLEEP IN A WET, UH, WET BED, I GUESS.
I MAKE WHAT AMANDA, YOU WANNA MAKE THE MOTION MATTER.
I'LL SECOND IT IF YOU'LL MAKE IT.
I'LL MAKE THE MOTION TO GO AHEAD AND ACCEPT ORDINANCE 2026 DASH 53.
ALL THOSE IN FAVOR INDICATE BY SAYING OR PUSHING GREEN.
IF YOU'RE OPPOSED, PUSH OR SAY RED.
WE ADJOURN THIS MEETING AND GET STRAIGHT TO THE OTHER MEETING.
BOARD, CAN YOU VOTE PLEASE? EVERYBODY VOTE ON THIS SO WE CAN GET TO THE NEXT MEETING.
MAYOR, I NEED TO CLOSE THIS ONE OUT.
LET ME KNOW WHEN YOU'RE READY.